IDPBlitz.com
Individual defensive players
IDP
fantasy defense
fantasy football
Home | Subscribe Now | Tell a Friend | Text Size | Forum: IDP Lineups | Search | Member Area
 About IDPBlitz
 Subscribe Now
 Free Samples
 Origins of IDPBlitz
 Contact Us
 IDP Orientation
 Why Play IDP?
 IDP Strategies
 Setting up an IDP League
 The Mark
 Standard Scoring Systems
 For Everyone
 News and Notes
 IDPBlitz Hall of Fame
 Premium Member Content
 Draft Kit Plus PLATINUM
 IDP Profiles
 IDP Draft Kit
 IDP Rookie Rankings
 IDP Special Reports
 Forum: User columns
 Forum: IDP Draft
 Forum: IDP Keepers
 Forum: IDP Trades
 Forum: Other IDP Topics
 Forum: Feedback IDPBlitz
 IDP Links
Includes non-IDP partner links
Draftsharks - Bold predictions, and IDPBlitz helps with the IDP content.



Monster Draft - Looking for offensive rankings? MonsterDraft customizes all of its rankings based on your league's scoring system. They're worth a look.
Draftcandy - Not IDP, but an amazing drafting system.
Fantasy Football Starters.
 Other
 Our Policy
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use


This site powered by MemberGate
home | IDP Strategies | Defensive Strategies Used in the NFL
 

Defensive Strategies Used in the NFL
Cecil Taylor

Often we're asked, "What defensive schemes do NFL teams run?" We answer that in a companion piece on NFL Defensive Alignments used this year. But it's really simplistic to confine a defense to just one alignment (unless you're Bill Parcells and just run the same conservative alignment play after play after play...)

Take the Chicago Bears circa 2006, for example. The Super Bowl Bears were known as a Cover 2 defense. In reality, they only ran the Cover 2 about 60% of the time. The other 40% came out of a 4-3 alignment but included multiple looks, blitzes and coverages. Their Super Bowl opponent, Indianapolis, is led by the biggest Tampa 2 advocate, Tony Dungy. Yet even the Colts don't run it every play.

In fact, let's tackle the whole Cover 2 idea for a moment. The Cover 2, as a pass coverage, has been around for decades: Split the back of the defense so each safety covers half of the field, and play zone coverage (usually) in front of them. What turned the Cover 2 into the Tampa 2 was other features of the defense, such as the philosophy that has defensive ends playing the pass first, then the run. Or as they're instructed, "Play the run on the way to the QB."

As a result, we'll try to discipline ourselves in future articles and columns to use the term "Tampa 2" instead of "Cover 2," because the Cover 2 can actually be run in any 4-3 or 3-4 defense.

OK, I dived in pretty deep at the start of the article. Let's back up and get to the basics.

3-4 vs. 4-3

When I was growing up, you used a longer notation: 3-4-4 or 4-3-4. This indicated 3 levels of the defense:

  • The number of down linemen, in other words, defenders who put their hands on the ground and lined up closest to the line of scrimmage. Linemen either use a 3-point stance (1 hand on the ground + 2 feet) or 4-point stance (2 hands on the ground + 2 feet, usually used on the goalline or other short-yardage situations).
  • The linebackers, who stand up (in what's called a 2-point stance, because they are standing on 2 feet) behind the defensive line.
  • The defensive backs, who play even deeper, anywhere from 2 to 20 yards behind the line of scrimmage, primarily deployed to defend the pass.

But in recent decades (ahem!), this notation has been shortened to 3-4 or 4-3, assuming everybody can figure out how many of the 11 defenders remain to be accounted for.

Other defensive systems I used to see back in my high school days were the 5-2, the 4-4 (occasionally used in colleges today, most recently by North Texas) and the 6-2. Oklahoma was famous for its 5-2 defense, and that's what we ran in high school, although it was really a hybrid 3-4 / 4-3 (there were all sorts of rules for when the defensive end stood up to look like an outside linebacker, or when the defensive end would put a hand on the ground.)

Most NFL teams today favor either the 3-4 or 4-3, although a few (most notably Baltimore) shift between the two schemes depending on the situation.

Read-and-React vs. Pressure

In the world of former Cowboys HC Bill Parcells, read-and-react is the only way to go. It's a way to prevent big plays. Usually, the front 7 (linemen and linebackers) are assigned 2 gaps to cover (gaps between offensive linemen, that is). They watch the flow of the play and then decide how best to protect the gaps to avoid giving up long runs. In a read-and-react scheme, the linemen are slower to rush the passer because they must watch for running plays first. (The opposite, you'll note, of the Tampa 2 assignment for defensive ends).

Pressure is more of a 1-gap scheme. The front 7 have only 1 gap to protect. Since they know what it is, they can be more aggressive about blasting into that area and trying to stop the rusher or make their way to the QB.

Whether a read-and-react defense or a pressure defense, the scheme can also call for blitzes, stunts, and slants - all ways to penetrate the offensive gaps and create havoc for the offense.

Impact on Individual Defensive Players

To continue this thread for paid members only, please see my Impact of Defensive Strategies on Individual Players column.


·  Tips of the Week: NFL 2007 Defensive Alignments
·  Impact of Defensive Strategies on IDPs