Upon Further Review - Michael Strahan
Cecil Taylor
Go directly to Landon's rebuttal.
OK, I realize this is a minority opinion. Maybe it's even a minority opinion
in my own head, since I've consistently ranked Michael Strahan in the Top 10 in
the 2006 IDP Draft Kit. But I think there's a nagging possibility of
sharp decline in 2006 by this inaugural IDPBlitz Hall of Famer.
I was reminded of this while looking at the list of players who didn't make
the dreaded Sept. 2 cut. The Dallas Cowboys released OT Rob Pettiti. Rob Pettiti
- Michael Strahan's personal rag doll in 2005. In 2 games, Strahan abused the
rookie for a total of 4 sacks. He also collected a sack off rookie Rams OT Alex
Barron, for a total of 5 sacks against 1st-year players. Nice work if you can
get it.
Now, a great DE is supposed to do this. That is one of many qualities that
separates Strahan from, say, Jacksonville's Reggie Hayward, who only mustered 1
sack in 4 games against the turnstile offensive lines in Houston, St. Louis and
San Francisco.
But look again at Strahan's recent history. In 2004, he missed half the
season with a torn pectoral muscle. Strahan came back 20 pounds lighter and
scored 11.5 sacks in '05 - sounds pretty good. But remember, 5 of those 11.5
sacks came at the expense of rookies. In the other 13 games, Strahan only
collected 6.5 sacks. Project that over a 16-game season, and the Giants legend
wouldn't be so legendary, with a mere 8 sacks. Talk about people starting to
call you old. If Strahan had only posted 8 sacks in 2005, the New York media
would've been ready to put him out to pasture.
So my question is, will it happen this year? Strahan turns 35 in November.
Yes, he's a workout maniac; in the Pro Football Preview version of Sports
Illustrated, Osi Umenyiora credits Strahan with teaching him how to work out
incredibly hard in order to produce incredible results. But Father Time catches
us all, starting first with those of us who eat a lot of doughnuts for
breakfast. Well, only on weekends, in my case.
Also, what about the Giants' decision to draft DE Mathias Kiwanuka in the 1st
round in 2006? They already had a worthy successor lined up in Justin Tuck, a
2nd year player who looked terrific in camp and was effective on special teams a
year ago. Why do you need to go 4-deep unless you think it might only be 3-deep?
Or that 1 of the 4 needs a lot more rest than he used to - rest that could also
lower his sack totals?
Maybe there are a couple of voices inside my head right now, arguing both
sides. Landon Reed will soon voice his displeasure with this opinion and side
with 1 of my voices. But if Strahan does decline to mortal single-digit sack
totals this season, the other voice gets to say, "I told you so."
Well here we are for round two of Upon Further Review and I have to
tell you, my adoring audience, that I am shocked Cecil is back for more after
his sound thumping in round one. (See the previous Upon Further Review
column regarding defensive backs in case you missed it.)
The discussion this go-around is that gap-toothed behemoth who is apparently
so likable that Brett Favre saw fit to take a dive for him so he could hold the
single season sack record. (The record was previously held by Mark Gastineau.)
He's 6'5", 275 pounds, and has 14 years of playing experience. He's recorded
129.5 total sacks in his career and doesn't look like he's gonna slow down much
this year.
Do I really need to use his name with you? Or, are you thinking: You had me
at gap-toothed. You had me at gap-toothed...
Michael Strahan is as good a bet to repeat his numbers this season as any
of IDPBlitz's other Top 10 defensive lineman. For some bizarre reason I need to
explain it all to the boss, the big cheese, the head honcho, the man who we've
all put our fantasy football lives in the hands of, Cecil Taylor. I'm going to
assume this is some grand test of his like when Yoda sent Luke into the cave in
Empire Strikes Back. If it's not a test, then be afraid, very afraid of
any further projections Cecil makes this year! (Just joking, we're all about
alternate opinions).
Here's the man's resume. I know that like a mutual fund past performance is
not an indicator or future returns, but it's hard not to think that way when you
look it over. Go ahead and dream of a 25 percent return on your investment in
The Strahan Blue Chip Fund of New York.
|
Year |
G |
Solo |
Ast |
Sacks |
|
1994 |
15 |
27 |
13 |
4.5 |
|
1995 |
15 |
49 |
10 |
7.5 |
|
1996 |
16 |
54 |
9 |
5 |
|
1997 |
16 |
49 |
19 |
14 |
|
1998 |
16 |
53 |
14 |
15 |
|
1999 |
16 |
43 |
15 |
5.5 |
|
2000 |
16 |
51 |
15 |
9.5 |
|
2001 |
16 |
62 |
11 |
22.5 |
|
2002 |
16 |
57 |
14 |
11 |
|
2003 |
16 |
60 |
15 |
18.5 |
|
2004 |
8 |
25 |
10 |
4 |
|
2005 |
16 |
61 |
21 |
11.5 |
Michael Strahan is, barring injury, good for yet another solid season. Yes,
Strahan is getting older, defensive end older at 34, but that's not enough of a
reason to doubt his ability. At 34, he's gotten savvier than some of the defensive
line coordinators in the league. He knows how to play his position, maintain
himself throughout a game and a season. He posted 11.5 sacks last season. He
tallied sacks in 8 separate games and remained productive in most other games by
using his athleticism to collect 5 tackles or more in 6 of the remaining 9 when
he didn't get to the quarterback. That was at age 33, which oh-by-the-way, is
also considered a little long in the ole gapped-tooth for a defensive end. One
more year, this year, is not going to see his performance collapse suddenly.
But, just for giggles, let's say he is going to be noticeably slower this season
and more prone to fatigue. On another team, I might worry.
The New York Giants are knowledgeable enough to realize that in two or three
years Strahan's productivity will decline. They drafted Justin Tuck and Mathias
Kiwanuka the past two seasons to prepare for this eventuality. They did not,
however, draft them to fill an immediate need like the Houston Texans did with
Mario Williams. By drafting two young, quality defensive ends, the Giants are
giving Strahan an even greater likelihood of repeating last season's numbers.
Strahan will rest more during games; and while this sort of reduction in playing
time usually worries me, instances such as this one I find completely tolerable.
Strahan's energy levels will remain high throughout the season because he's
getting spelled for a bit.
I can see Cecil is a little wobbly on his feet. His arms are riding low and
his feet look like they've cemented themselves to the mat. I may as well give
you folks a little more show for your cash before I finish him off with one last
blast.
Michael Strahan is going to continue to record sound game play totals because
he won't be working alone. Osi Umenyiora is going to draw all the attention this
season on the field. He's going to be double teamed, chipped, and held
constantly each Sunday afternoon. Umenyiora's trials will be to Strahan's
benefit as he'll be matched one-on-one most plays he's in with only a lowly back
to try and chip him. Shoot, it'll just tick him off. With Antonio Pierce
dropping back to cover short passing lanes and LaVar Arrington darting into the
line seeking sacks of his own, Strahan might well be wondering if he hasn't
suddenly stepped back into 2001. Too bad they don't play Brett and his boys this
year.
Well, I've made the best show of this as I could given what was before me.
It's time Ramblin' Landon laid out the final blow. The New York Giants are going
to play some classic games this season in Philly, Washington, and Dallas to be
sure. They are going to play some lame games too, at least in the trenches, when
they play Buffalo, Tennessee, Houston, Tampa Bay, and New Orleans. Those five
teams are among the worst offensive lines in the game; and Chicago, Dallas, and
Indianapolis only rate middle of the pack. Bad offensive lines will make anyone
look like a Pro Bowl player. They'll make Strahan look like a heavy weight
champion. POW!
10...9...8...7...6...
-He's not moving folks!
5...4...3...
-The ringside doctor is attending him now!
2...1...
-Time to clean up the mat.
|